0330 113 8333 0121 386 3344 Book a Free Valuation Login

Should the 6,658 home owning OAP’s of Erdington be forced to downsize?

April 28, 2017
This was a question posed to me on social media a few weeks ago, after my article about our mature members of Erdington society and the fact many retirees feel trapped in their homes. After working hard for many years and buying a home for themselves and their family, the children have subsequently flown the nest and now they are left to rattle round in a big house. Many feel trapped in their big homes (hence I dubbed these Erdington home owning mature members of our society, ‘Generation Trapped’). So, should we force OAP Erdington homeowners to downsize? Well in the original article, I suggested that we as a society should encourage, through building, tax breaks and social acceptance that it’s a good thing to downsize. But should the Government force OAP’s? Well, one of the biggest reasons OAP’s move home is health (or lack of it)   Looking at the statistics for Erdington (or B23 and B24 to be precise), of the 6,658 Homeowners who are 65 years and older, whilst 2,953 of them described themselves in good or very good health, a sizeable 2,476 home owning OAPs described themselves as in fair health and 1,229 in bad or very bad health. 18.45% of Erdington home owning OAP’s are in poor health But if you look at the figures for the whole of Birmingham City Council (not just Erdington), there are only 2,568 specialist retirement homes that one could buy (if they were in fact for sale) and 10,191 homes available to rent from the Council and other specialist providers (again- you would be waiting for dead man’s shoes to get your foot in the door) and many older homeowners wouldn’t feel comfortable with the idea of renting a retirement property after enjoying the security of owning their own home for most of their adult lives. My intuition tells me the majority ‘would be’ Erdington downsizers could certainly afford to move but are staying put in bigger family homes because they can’t find a suitable smaller property. The fact is there simply aren’t enough bungalows for the healthy older members of the Erdington population and specialist retirement properties for the ones who aren’t in such good health … we need to build more appropriate houses in Erdington.  The Government’s Housing White Paper, published a few weeks ago, could have solved so many problems with the UK housing market, including the issue of homing our aging population. Instead, it ended up feeling annoyingly ambiguous. Forcing our older generation to move with such measures as a punitive taxation (say a tax on wasted bedrooms for people who are retired) would be the wrong thing to do. Instead of the stick – maybe the Government could use the carrot tactics and offered tax breaks for downsizers. Who knows – but something has to happen? … and come to think about it, isn’t the word ‘downsize’ such an awful word?  I prefer to use the word ‘decent-size’ instead of ‘down-size’- as the other phrase feels like they are lowering themselves, as though they are having to downgrade themselves in their retirement (and let’s be frank – no one likes to be downgraded). The simple fact is we are living longer as a population and constantly growing with increased birth rates and immigration. So, what I would say to all the homeowners and property owning public of Erdington is … more houses and apartments need to be built in the Erdington area, especially more specialist retirement properties and bungalows. The Government had a golden opportunity with the White Paper – and were sadly found lacking. And a message to my Erdington property investor readers whilst this issue gets sorted in the coming decade(s)  – maybe seriously consider doing up older bungalows – people will pay handsomely for them – be they for sale or even rent?
Henley Charles - Birmingham’s very own online estate agent © 2017. All rights reserved. Design by WOOBRO

Henley Charles Estate Agents is rated 1.00 stars by Reviews.co.uk based on 5 merchant reviews

1.00 / 5 Rating
5 Reviews
Very rude and have a habit of not replying. Have seen personal info of clients too. Very unprofessional and ill-mannered. How they received an award is beyond me.
Very bad customer service.
dismayed to see private client details just left out on tables at the front of the office.